1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 21 N.J.
  5. 21 N.J. 326 (1956)
 

STATE v. SMITH

21 N.J. 326 (1956)

121 A.2d 729

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. DRUTLER SMITH AND HERBERT SMITH, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 26, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry Kay argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Sanderson & Cullen, attorneys).

Mr. Myron W. Kronisch, Legal Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Charles V. Webb, Jr., Prosecutor of the Pleas, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by OLIPHANT, J.

We certified the cause here on our own motion, R.R. 1:10-1(a). This is an appeal from the convictions of the defendants-appellants, Drutler Smith and Herbert Smith, in the Essex County Court on indictments charging them with unlawfully and knowingly having in their possession lottery slips contrary to the provisions of N.J.S. 2A:121-3, and the conviction of Herbert Smith on a companion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases