ELEUTERI v. RICHMAN


43 N.J. Super. 303 (1956)

128 A.2d 743

HARRY ELEUTERI AND EDWARD DANLEY, PLAINTIFFS, v. GROVER C. RICHMAN, JR., ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, AND MARTIN J. QUEENAN, COUNTY PROSECUTOR OF BURLINGTON COUNTY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided December 26, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James M. Davis, Jr. (Messrs. Powell & Davis), attorney for plaintiffs.

Mr. Stanley Cohen, Deputy Attorney-General, attorney for defendants.


HANEMAN, J.S.C.

Defendant Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of New Jersey, has moved for a summary judgment on the pleadings. For the purpose of this motion, the facts as pleaded in the complaint must be taken as true.

The complaint is in two counts. One relates to the plaintiff Harry Eleuteri, the second to the plaintiff Edward Danley. Although the details of the two causes of action vary somewhat factually, the issues raised are common to both. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases