FOUST v. FOUST

Docket No. L.A. 23552.

47 Cal.2d 121 (1956)

302 P.2d 11

CHARLES W. FOUST, Respondent, v. ISMAY M. FOUST, Appellant.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

October 9, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Ibanez for Appellant.

Herman Wildman for Respondent.


SPENCE, J.

Defendant appeals from an order quashing execution and restraining the sheriff from selling plaintiff's property. The only question to be determined is whether a property settlement agreement had been so merged into an annulment decree that its provision for monthly payments became an operative part thereof, enforceable by execution. The trial court held that it had not but the record does not sustain its ruling.

The parties separated 14 years after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases