DZIENGEL v. DZIENGEL


269 Wis. 591 (1955)

DZIENGEL, Respondent, vs. DZIENGEL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 3, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Sydney M. Eisenberg and Joseph B. Michalski, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Eisenberg.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by John L. Newman and T. F. Swietlik, both of Milwaukee.


GEHL, J.

Counsel for defendant-appellant have failed in the preparation of their brief and appendix to comply with several rules of the court. Their failure has not aided us in our study of their appeal. Although there are over 300 pages in the bill of exceptions their statement of facts consists of but two pages, in which no reference is made to the pages of the appendix for the statements of fact made, Supreme Court Rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases