WM. H. HEINEMANN CREAMERIES v. MILW. AUTO. INS. CO.


270 Wis. 443 (1955)

WM. H. HEINEMANN CREAMERIES, INC., and another, Appellants, vs. MILWAUKEE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 28, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Bendinger, Hayes & Kluwin, and oral argument by Donald J. Tikalsky, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by McCue & Regan, attorneys, and John L. Schlatterer and Francis D. McCue of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Francis D. McCue.


CURRIE, J.

The following three issues are presented on this appeal:

(1) Was it error for the trial court to permit the defendants to file an amended answer on the day of trial, so as to set up additional defenses based upon the prior compromise settlement and the order dismissing the circuit court action?

(2) Is the order of dismissal of the circuit court action commenced by Tronca against Heinemann, in which Tronca was plaintiff and Heinemann defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases