1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 270 Wis.
  5. 270 Wis. 368 (1955)
 

AUSTER v. ZASPEL

270 Wis. 368 (1955)

AUSTER (Kathryn), Plaintiff and Appellant, vs. ZASPEL, by Guardian ad litem, and others, Defendants: AUSTER (Walter), Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 28, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Morrissy, Morrissy & Zastrow of Elkhorn, and Leo E. Vaudreuil of Kenosha, and oral argument by Mr. Vaudreuil.

For the respondent there was a brief by Kenney, Korf & Pfeil of Elkhorn, and oral argument by Richard Pfeil.

BROWN, J.

If there is any credible evidence which, under any reasonable view, fairly admits of an inference that supports the jury's finding, neither the trial court nor an appellate court has any authority to change the jury's answers or findings. Millard v. North River Ins. Co. (1930), 201 Wis. 69, 228 N. W. 746; Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co. (1930), 201 Wis. 113, 228 N. W. 741. The jury's verdict...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases