1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 269 Wis.
  5. 269 Wis. 324 (1955)
 

ZWEIG v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

269 Wis. 324 (1955)

ZWEIG and another, Appellants, vs. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 5, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Stroud, Stebbins, Wingert & Stroud of Madison, and oral argument by Byron H. Stebbins.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Levitan.

For the respondent Clara M. Henderson there was a brief by Godfrey & Godfrey of Elkhorn.

FAIRCHILD, C. J.

A controversy over compensation for injuries sustained by Robert Henderson in the course of his employment arises because the appellants question the jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission in acting as it did in modifying the order dated October 11, 1948. On June 17, 1952, Henderson was awarded additional compensation based on a finding of 40 per cent of permanent bodily disability.

The circuit court ruled that the commission, under circumstances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases