HOLMAN v. INDUSTRIAL S. & MANFG. CO.

Calendar No. 46,617.

344 Mich. 235 (1955)

74 N.W.2d 322

HOLMAN v. INDUSTRIAL STAMPING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 28, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward N. Barnard, for plaintiffs.

Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, for defendant Industrial Stamping & Manufacturing Company.

James P. Hannan and Jack G. Day, for defendants Mechanics Educational Society of America and its officers in opposition to plaintiff's appeal.

Amicus curiae:

Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Norton J. Come and Duane Beeson, for National Labor Relations Board.


BUTZEL, J.

The Industrial Stamping & Manufacturing Company, a division of Vinco Corporation, hereinafter referred to as defendant company, engages in the business of stamping and plating automobile parts. Until September, 1954, its operations were conducted in Detroit, Michigan, at 2 locations, hereinafter referred to as the Epworth plant (stamping) and the Beaufait plant (plating). The employees of both plants were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases