1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 48 Wn.2d
  5. 48 Wn.2d 6 (1955)
 

HURSPOOL v. RALSTON

No. 33123.

48 Wn.2d 6 (1955)

290 P.2d 981

OLIVE M. HURSPOOL, Appellant, v. F.L. RALSTON, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

December 1, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tonkoff, Holst & Hopp and Paul R. Roesch, for appellant.

Minnick & Hahner, for respondent.

WEAVER, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action for damages for malpractice against defendant, Dr. F.L. Ralston, an eye specialist of Walla Walla. The trial court sustained a challenge to the sufficiency of plaintiff's evidence. She appeals from a judgment of dismissal.

[1, 2] The oft-quoted rule which governs this case is set forth in Cochran v. Harrison Memorial Hospital, 42 Wn.2d 264, 267,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases