1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 17 N.J.
  5. 17 N.J. 517 (1955)
 

SUN DIAL CORP. v. RIDEOUT

17 N.J. 517 (1955)

111 A.2d 881

SUN DIAL CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CARL D. RIDEOUT, JAMES L. RIDEOUT, ROBERT A. WHITFIELD, NANCY ORI WHITFIELD AND PRECISION MARKING CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 28, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Walter D. Van Riper argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Van Riper & Belmont, attorneys).

Mr. F.O. Miniutti argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Davidson & Miniutti, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The plaintiff prevailed in its action to enjoin the individual defendants, its former employees (along with their corporation, the defendant Precision Marking Co.) from using or disclosing the plaintiff's secret process which they learned while in its employ. See Sun Dial Corp. v. Rideout, 29 N.J.Super. 361 (App. Div. 1954), affirmed 16 N.J....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases