1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 208 Md.
  5. 208 Md. 245 (1955)
 

BAIRD v. C. & P. TEL. CO. OF BALTIMORE

[No. 14, October Term, 1955.]

208 Md. 245 (1955)

117 A.2d 873

BAIRD ET AL., TRADING AS BAIRD SEATING COMPANY v. THE CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF BALTIMORE CITY SAME v. REUBEN H. DONNELLEY CORPORATION SAME v. THE CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF BALTIMORE CITY AND REUBEN H. DONNELLEY CORPORATION

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 9, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles G. Page and R. Taylor McLean, with whom were White, Page and Lentz, on the brief, for appellant.

William L. Marbury, with whom were Piper and Marbury on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and HAMMOND, JJ.

COLLINS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal by William F. Baird, Sr., William F. Baird, Jr., and Robert S. Baird, a partnership trading as Baird Seating Company, (Baird), from the amount of a judgment rendered in its favor against the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Baltimore City, (the Telephone Company), and from a judgment for costs in favor of Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation, (Donnelley).

On October 3, 1952, Baird filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases