ANDREWS v. BOARD.

Nos. 34228 and 34238.

164 Ohio St. 275 (1955)

ANDREWS, JR., D. B. A. BUFFALO GRILL & HOTEL, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF LIQUOR CONTROL, APPELLEE. RUFO, D. B. A. MICKEY'S CAFE, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF LIQUOR CONTROL, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 23, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Isadore Topper and Mr. John C. Sheppard, for appellant in cause No. 34228.

Mr. Isadore Topper and Mr. John T. Feighan, Jr., for appellant in cause No. 34238.

Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, and Mr. Kiehner Johnson, for appellee.


STEWART, J.

Both the present cases involve the same legal question.

Although it is true that in the Rufo case it is argued that the provisions of Section 6064-68, General Code, are void because they are indefinite, uncertain, inadequate, unreasonable and ambiguous, we are of the opinion that their meaning is clear.

It is true that an original container can not be diluted, and the language of the statute is far from perfect grammatically, but we have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases