ST. FRANCIS v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMM.


270 Wis. 91 (1955)

CITY OF ST. FRANCIS, Appellant, vs. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 3, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by William H. Bowman of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by the Attorney General and William E. Torkelson, chief counsel for the Public Service Commission, and oral argument by Mr. Torkelson.

For the town of Lake there was a brief by Herbert L. Mount and Frederick E. Reidenbach, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Mount.


BROADFOOT, J.

On the question of jurisdiction, the commission contends that its determination of the value is not subject to review under the provisions of ch. 227, Stats. It contends that it merely made a finding of fact and did not issue any order or directive. The commission contends that a finding of fact is not reviewable and that there is no statutory provision that the action of the commission in finding the value of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases