HARPER v. ADAMETZ


142 Conn. 218 (1955)

FOWLER V. HAPPER v. JERE ADAMETZ ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 1, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fowler V. Harper, pro se, and Catherine G. Roraback, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Richard C. Parmelee, with whom, on the brief, was Bernard A. Kosicki, for the appellees (defendants).

BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN, WYNNE, DALY and BERDON, JS.


BALDWIN, J.

This action, based upon fraud, was brought by the plaintiff against the named defendant and his son Walter Adametz. The court rendered judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff has appealed.

The facts found, which are not subject to correction, are as follows: Joseph B. Tesar was conservator of the estate of his father, William Tesar, an incompetent, who owned eighty acres of land and the buildings thereon in the town of Haddam. The defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases