1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 205 Or.
  5. 205 Or. 116 (1955)
 

GRAY v. GRAY

205 Or. 116 (1955)

286 P.2d 138

GRAY v. GRAY

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed as modified July 13, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S.H. Burleigh, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Dixon, Burleigh & Swindley, of La Grande.

Harold A. Fabre, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Kilkenny & Fabre of Pendleton.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and TOOZE, ROSSMAN, LUSK, and PERRY, Justices.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

PERRY, J.

This is a suit for the partition of real property. The plaintiff and the defendant were formerly wife and husband; during their married life they had acquired approximately 600 acres of real property consisting of 106 acres of farm land and approximately 480 acres of mountain, timber, and pasture land. They held this property as tenants by the entirety. In February, 1952, as a result...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases