1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 17 N.J.
  5. 17 N.J. 239 (1955)
 

HOLLISTER v. FIEDLER

17 N.J. 239 (1955)

111 A.2d 57

ROBINSON G. HOLLISTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND JEAN HOLLISTER, DEFENDANT ON CROSS-CLAIM-RESPONDENT, v. THEODORE FIEDLER, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM C. FIEDLER, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 17, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph Bigel argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Bruck & Bigel, attorneys).

Mr. Harold D. Feuerstein argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Lester Sandles, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER, J.

The inquiry here concerns the ownership of one share of the capital stock of Fiedler & Hollister, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, determinative of majority control; and the decisive point is whether evidence adduced from the plaintiff Hollister of an asserted transaction with the deceased Fiedler bearing upon the issue transgresses the policy of N.J.S. 2A:81-2, formerly R.S. 2:97-2.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases