1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 18 N.J.
  5. 18 N.J. 218 (1955)
 

NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY CO. v. POPOVICH

18 N.J. 218 (1955)

113 A.2d 666

NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NICHOLAS POPOVICH, SR., AND NICHOLAS POPOVICH, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS N. POPOVICH & SON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 25, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Reuben P. Goldstein argued the cause for the defendants-appellants.

Mr. Harry Schaffer argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Waxman & Waxman, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by OLIPHANT, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division which reversed a judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, in favor of the defendants-appellants and against the plaintiff-respondent entered on a jury verdict of no cause of action and remanding the cause for a new trial. We granted certification on application made under R.R. 1:10-2(d).

The basic question involved was whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases