STATE v. CESTONE


38 N.J. Super. 139 (1955)

118 A.2d 416

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RALPH R. CESTONE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 21, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George Warren argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Italo M. Tarantola, attorney; Messrs. Warren & Stein, of counsel).

Mr. Herbert T. Heisel, Jr., Prosecutor of Hunterdon County, argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

The present defendant feels sufficiently aggrieved to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Hunterdon County Court rendered on February 19, 1955 imposing upon him a fine of $10. To him the judgment is vexatious because it constitutes an adjudication that he offended the law. He employs his undeniable right to have the propriety of the proceedings at his trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases