Determination annulled, without costs, and matter remitted to respondents for rehearing and action not inconsistent herewith.
Whether the first finding is supported by substantial evidence depends upon whether the use of petitioner's premises for a restaurant was a permissible non-conforming use under the zoning ordinance. Inasmuch as the record does not disclose the effective date of the zoning ordinance, insofar as it was applicable to these premises, or the use...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
