STEINKE v. BELL


32 N.J. Super. 67 (1954)

107 A.2d 825

ELEANOR STEINKE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ISIDORE BELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 15, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jack A. Skarbnik argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

Mr. William E. James argued the cause for defendant-appellant.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CLAPP, S.J.A.D.

Defendant, a dentist, appeals from a judgment against him obtained in the county district court in an action for malpractice. He raises a single question, should the judgment be reversed because of plaintiff's failure to produce expert testimony on the trial.

Defendant removed plaintiff's lower left second molar, as she, the plaintiff, desired. However in the process, so the trial judge found, defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases