PONDER v. McKINZIE

34988.

89 Ga. App. 846 (1954)

81 S.E.2d 551

PONDER v. McKINZIE.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rountree & Rountree, for plaintiff in error.

Williams & Smith, Price, Spivey & Carlton, contra.


CARLISLE, J.

1. By certain of his special demurrers, the defendant Ponder demands to know: (a) Why McKinzie had no control over the taxicab in which he was riding? (b) Where was McKinzie sitting in the taxicab just prior to the collision? (c) Was McKinzie asleep or awake just prior to the collision? (d) How long had the taxicab in which McKinzie was riding been traveling at 65 miles per hour? (e) What was the visibility and how far could objects have been seen in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases