1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 265 Wis.
  5. 265 Wis. 652 (1954)
 

BELL v. GRAY-ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION CO.

265 Wis. 652 (1954)

BELL, Respondent, vs. GRAY-ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 2, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by McLeod & Donohue, and oral argument by Kenneth McLeod and Raymond R. Colwin, all of Fond du Lac.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Ervin A. Weinke, attorney, and James M. George of counsel, both of Fond du Lac.

FAIRCHILD, C. J.

The controversy here involves the liability of a construction company for damage caused by its agent's acts to valuable property. The property affected consisted of live mink, which were, at the time of the incident in the extremely nervous state peculiar to them at the helping season. At that time, mink, if disturbed by unusual noises, destroy their young, and they themselves, if they survive, either die, or undergo changes in nature which result...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases