1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 200 Or.
  5. 200 Or. 497 (1954)
 

LONSFORD ET AL. v. BURTON ET AL.

200 Or. 497 (1954)

267 P.2d 208

LONSFORD ET AL. v. BURTON ET AL. and BAILEY ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 24, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart W. Hill, of Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were James L. Means, and Kerr & Hill, all of Portland.

Thomas H. Tongue, III, of Portland, argued the cause for defendants-respondents and intervenors-respondents. On the brief were Clif. Langsdale of Kansas City, Mo., and Hicks, Davis & Tongue, all of Portland.

Before LATOURETTE, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK, BRAND, TOOZE, and PERRY, Justices.

DECREE AFFIRMED.

BRAND, J.

This is a class suit in equity brought by three members of Local 401 of the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders and Helpers of America "on behalf of themselves and all other members of Local 401," seeking equitable relief from alleged interference with the affairs of Local 401 by the International Brotherhood, with which Local 401 is affiliated. Plaintiffs prosecute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases