1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. T.C.
  4. 22 T.C.
  5. 22 T.C. 671 (1954)
 

SEASONGOOD v. COMMISSIONER

Docket Nos. 42537, 42538, 42539.

22 T.C. 671 (1954)

MURRAY SEASONGOOD, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. AGNES SEASONGOOD, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. MURRAY SEASONGOOD AND AGNES SEASONGOOD, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

United States Tax Court.

Filed June 28, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James D. Long, Esq., Harry Stickney, Esq., and Murray Seasongood, Esq., for the petitioners.

R. G. de Quevedo, Esq., for the respondent.

In these proceedings, consolidated for hearing, respondent has determined deficiencies in income tax as follows:

                         Docket No. 42537

Year                           Petitioner                   Amount

1946 --------   Murray Seasongood ---------------------     $736.00
1947 --------   Murray Seasongood ---------------------    1,532.65

                         Docket No. 42538

1946 --------  ...

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases