LOOS v. BOSTON SHOE CO.

Docket No. 19852.

123 Cal.App.2d 564 (1954)

266 P.2d 884

EMMA LOOS, Appellant, v. BOSTON SHOE COMPANY et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

February 26, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hirson & Horn for Appellant.

Schell, Delamer & Loring for Respondents.


SHINN, P.J.

Plaintiff was struck by a car owned and operated by defendant Carey, an employee of Boston Shoe Company. Jack Smith also was sued as an owner of the car but there is no discussion in the briefs as to his connection with the accident. Plaintiff's evidence was presented to a jury. When plaintiff had rested, the motion of Boston Shoe Company and Smith for a nonsuit was granted, and judgment was ordered in their favor for costs. Plaintiff and Carey stipulated...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases