LOOS v. BOSTON SHOE CO.

Docket No. 19852.

123 Cal.App.2d 564 (1954)

266 P.2d 884

EMMA LOOS, Appellant, v. BOSTON SHOE COMPANY et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

February 26, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hirson & Horn for Appellant.

Schell, Delamer & Loring for Respondents.


SHINN, P.J.

Plaintiff was struck by a car owned and operated by defendant Carey, an employee of Boston Shoe Company. Jack Smith also was sued as an owner of the car but there is no discussion in the briefs as to his connection with the accident. Plaintiff's evidence was presented to a jury. When plaintiff had rested, the motion of Boston Shoe Company and Smith for a nonsuit was granted, and judgment was ordered in their favor for costs. Plaintiff and Carey stipulated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases