MONROE v. DURKIN

No. 34168.

162 Ohio St. 446 (1954)

MONROE, TREAS., APPELLEE, v. DURKIN ET AL., APPELLANTS; CITY OF SOUTH EUCLID, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 15, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frank T. Cullitan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Julius J. Badzik, for appellee Leslie R. Monroe.

Messrs. Davies, Eshner, Johnson & Miller, for appellants.

Mr. Clifford H. Bernard, city solicitor, for appellee City of South Euclid.


It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C. J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases