1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 210 F.2d
  5. 210 F.2d 376 (1954)
 

CHEMICAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. DIMOCK

No. 22961.

210 F.2d 376 (1954)

CHEMICAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Honorable Edward J. DIMOCK, United States District Judge, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided February 5, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shearman & Sterling & Wright, New York City, for petitioner; John A. Wilson, New York City, of counsel.

Burlingham, Hupper & Kennedy, New York City, for Holland-American Line in support of petitioner; Harold M. Kennedy and Hervey C. Allen, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

Bennet, House & Couts, New York City, for Arnold Bernstein, plaintiff below, in opposition; Victor House, Albert I. Edelman and Werner Ilsen, New York City, of counsel.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner charges that Judge Dimock disregarded our mandate in Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij (Chemical Bank & Trust Co.), 2 Cir., 173 F.2d 71, 75-76, but since we have amended our mandate in this case, 2 Cir., 210 F.2d 375, we find it unnecessary to pass on the validity of the petitioner's contentions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases