1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 16 N.J.
  5. 16 N.J. 465 (1954)
 

CITY OF TRENTON v. LENZNER

16 N.J. 465 (1954)

109 A.2d 409

CITY OF TRENTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ISADORE LENZNER AND FREDA LENZNER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PRINCETON, EXR. OF THE EST. OF JOHN S. VAN NEST, MORTGAGEE, WILLIAM EARDLEY, SOL BRODER, ROY ADAMS, MICHAEL CUNNINGHAM AND FRED BARTEL, TENANTS, DEFENDANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 22, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. John A. Hartpence and David Frankel argued the cause for the appellants.

Mr. Louis Josephson argued the cause for the respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The Appellate Division affirmed the summary judgment for the plaintiff which had been entered in the Law Division. See City of Trenton v. Lenzner, 29 N.J.Super. 514 (App. Div. 1954). We granted certification under R.R. 1:10-2.

Trenton's parking problem is a serious one and has been the subject of much concern amongst its officials and citizens...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases