AMSEL v. BROOKS


141 Conn. 288 (1954)

MILTON AMSEL ET AL. v. CLARENCE G. BROOKS ET AL., DENTAL COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 18, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Darcy, for the plaintiffs.

Louis Weinstein, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was William L. Beers, attorney general, for the defendants.

INGLIS, C. J., BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN, WYNNE and DALY, JS.


BALDWIN, J.

The plaintiffs, who are partners doing business as the Amsel Dental Laboratory, brought an action in the Superior Court against the defendants, who comprise the dental commission of the state of Connecticut, asking for a judgment declaring unconstitutional "An Act concerning the Practice of Dentistry," being No. 486 of the Public Acts of 1953. General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1953, §§ 1696c, 1697c. By stipulation, the case has been reserved for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases