1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 30 N.J.
  5. 30 N.J. Super. 353 (1954)
 

HENDERSON v. CELANESE CORP.

30 N.J. Super. 353 (1954)

104 A.2d 720

HAROLD HENDERSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CELANESE CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 28, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Mortimer Wald argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman, attorneys).

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Mr. Stanley U. Phares, attorney).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and CLAPP.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.

The issue in this appeal is whether the resulting injury of an idiopathic fall on a concrete floor at appellant's place of employment is compensable.

There is no factual dispute. The petitioner had been a sufferer from epilepsy for a number of years. It is conceded that on the day in question he had a seizure which caused him to fall to the concrete floor in the plant, striking his head thereon,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases