UNITED STATES v. PARNES

No. 94, Docket 22840.

210 F.2d 141 (1954)

UNITED STATES v. PARNES et al.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided February 3, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward V. Broderick, New York City (Joseph H. Broderick, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

J. Edward Lumbard, U. S. Atty. for Southern Dist. of N. Y., New York City (William Esbitt, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before FRANK, MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Of course, the fact that a conspiracy succeeded does not bar conviction for the crime of conspiracy. The evidence amply supported the verdict. Proof that no export license had issued at New York, whence the gold was exported, justified an inference, not rebutted by Parnes, that no license did issue. The furtive conduct of Parnes and the co-conspirators made it reasonable to infer that they knew that there had been no compliance with the conditions of lawful...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases