1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 81 S.E.2d
  5. 81 S.E.2d 206 (1954)
 

EX PARTE BENTLEY

No. 290.

81 S.E.2d 206 (1954)

240 N.C. 112

Ex parte BENTLEY. STATE v. BENTLEY.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 7, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry McMullan, Atty. Gen., Ralph Moody, Asst. Atty. Gen., R. Brookes Peters, Laurence J. Beltman, and E. W. Hooper, Raleigh, for petitioner.

No counsel contra.

JOHNSON, Justice.

In re Smith, 235 N.C. 169, 69 S.E.2d 174, is decisive of this case. The rule is that two sentences, in the absence of a directive as to time of commencement, in order to run concurrently, must be sentences to the same place of confinement. Sentences to different institutions, in the very nature of things, are consecutive and not concurrent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases