1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 16 N.J.
  5. 16 N.J. 252 (1954)
 

SUN DIAL CORP. v. RIDEOUT

16 N.J. 252 (1954)

108 A.2d 442

SUN DIAL CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CARL D. RIDEOUT, JAMES L. RIDEOUT, ROBERT A. WHITFIELD, NANCY ORI WHITFIELD AND PRECISION MARKING CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 18, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Walter D. Van Riper argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Van Riper & Belmont, attorneys).

Mr. Ira Milton Jones of the Wisconsin Bar argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Davidson & Miniutti, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The Chancery Division dismissed the plaintiff's action to enjoin the individual defendants, its former employees (along with their corporation, the defendant Precision Marking Co.), from using or disclosing the process which they learned while in its employ. See 25 N.J.Super. 591 (Ch. Div. 1953). The Appellate Division found that the evidence adequately established...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases