Per Curiam.
This court allowed plaintiff's motion to certify for the purpose of reviewing the conclusion indicated by the opinion of the Court of Appeals that parol evidence was admissible to show that plaintiff and defendant did not intend paragraph 8 of the agreement of March 1944 to provide for conveyance of the
However, after consideration...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.