1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 118 F.Supp.
  5. 118 F.Supp. 899 (1954)
 

HARTFORD NAT. BANK & TRUST CO. v. HENRY L. CROWLEY & CO.

Civ. No. 857.

118 F.Supp. 899 (1954)

HARTFORD NAT. BANK & TRUST CO. et al. v. HENRY L. CROWLEY & CO., Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

February 9, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Crummy & Consodine, Newark, N. J., Connolly, Coochs & Bove and Arthur G. Connolly, Wilmington, Del., for plaintiffs.

Shanley & Fisher, Newark, N. J., Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Barrows & Taylor and Thomas F. Reddy, Jr., New York City, for defendant.

SMITH, District Judge.

This is a civil action under the patent laws. The first count of the amended complaint states a claim for the infringement of three patents, of which the plaintiffs are admittedly the holders, and seeks the usual relief; the second count states an ostensible claim for relief under the Declaratory Judgments Act, and is predicated on a patent of which the defendant is allegedly the owner. The action is before the Court at this time on the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases