SPECHT v. EASTWOOD-NEALLEY CORP.


25 N.J. Super. 69 (1953)

95 A.2d 485

HARRY G. SPECHT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS, v. EASTWOOD-NEALLEY CORPORATION, THE NATIONAL STATE BANK OF NEWARK, AS TRUSTEE, ETC., AND CALVIN H. NEALLEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 10, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Vincent P. Biunno argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys).

Mr. Ernest F. Keer, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Boyd, Dodd, Keer & Booth, attorneys).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

While this appeal implicates only the propriety of a denial of a motion to dissolve a pendente lite restraining order, it seems to require a comprehensive consideration of all of the allegations contained in the four counts of the complaint which, viewed in its entirety, reveal the intrinsicalities of the plaintiff's alleged cause of action.

The complaint, fortified by a conventional verification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases