P.U.D. NO. 1 OF COWLITZ CTY. v. NEW AMSTERDAM CAS. CO.

No. 32303.

42 Wn.2d 894 (1953)

259 P.2d 645

PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF COWLITZ COUNTY et al., Respondents, v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

July 17, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson & Uhlmann and John C. Patterson, for appellant.

Melvin C. Rooney and James O. Ballou, for respondents.


WEAVER, J.

The question presented is whether, under the facts, plaintiff is entitled to recover a loss, alleged to be compensable under the terms of a burglary-coverage clause of an insurance policy.

The defendant insurance company appeals from a judgment against it.

The insurance company contracted to indemnify the insured for all loss sustained

"... [VII.] of merchandise, furniture, fixtures and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases