1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 265 Wis.
  5. 265 Wis. 535 (1953)
 

SCHMIDLKOFER v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

265 Wis. 535 (1953)

SCHMIDLKOFER, Appellant, vs. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 30, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Klaprat, Larson & Rogge of Wausau, and oral argument by E. E. Klaprat.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Levitan.

For the respondent John Check there was a brief and oral argument by Walter A. Graunke of Wausau.

For the respondents Harold Rebe and Travelers Insurance Company there was a brief by Stroud, Stebbins, Wingert & Stroud of Madison, and oral argument by Byron H. Stebbins.

FAIRCHILD, J.

It may be conceded as fundamental that where only one inference can reasonably be drawn from undisputed facts a question of law arises under the statute. However, it is true that even "if there is no dispute in the testimony a question of fact is presented if different inferences may be drawn, or `if something more than the application of a rule of law is required in order to reach a final conclusion.'" Hipke v. Industrial Comm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases