NELSON v. MURPHY

No. 32439.

42 Wn.2d 737 (1953)

258 P.2d 472

HAROLD F. NELSON, Appellant, v. ALBERT MURPHY et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

June 23, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Monheimer, Schermer & Mifflin, for appellant.

Clarence J. Coleman and Eggerman, Rosling & Williams, for respondents.


MALLERY, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal sustaining a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.

The plaintiff, a fifty-five-year-old married man, was employed at the Bayside Iron Works in a supervisory capacity, which required him to make himself heard above the din of operations in the machine shops.

In November, 1948, he called at the office of the defendant, Dr. Albert Murphy, for an examination to determine the cause of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases