MATTER OF GLICKMAN v. GREATER N. Y. TAXPAYERS


305 N.Y. 431 (1953)

In the Matter of the Claim of Frances Glickman, Respondent, v. Greater New York Taxpayers et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 5, 1953


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Shumate and Edward J. Haniver for appellants.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Roy Wiedersum, Wendell P. Brown and Harry Pastor of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

LEWIS, Ch. J., DESMOND and FROESSEL, JJ., concur with FULD, J.; CONWAY, J., dissents in opinion in which DYE, J., concurs.


FULD, J.

While workmen's compensation "is not confined by common-law conceptions of scope of employment" (O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 340 U.S. 504, 506), more must be shown, to warrant an award, than injury or death and the relationship of employer and employee. It must also appear that such injury or death arose "out of and in the course of" the employment (Workmen's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases