BARFIELD v. AIKEN

18024.

209 Ga. 483 (1953)

74 S.E.2d 100

BARFIELD, executor, et al. v. AIKEN.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided January 13, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis & Friedin and Mixon & Forrester, for plaintiffs in error.

Paul Webb, William Hall and Paul Webb Jr., contra.


HAWKINS, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Only the 7th headnote requires any elaboration. We fully recognize the well-settled rule that in the construction of wills the courts should look to that interpretation which carries out the provisions of the statute of distribution, rather than that which defeats, them; that, in the absence of anything in the will to the contrary, the presumption is that the ancestor intended that his property should go where...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases