1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 78 S.E.2d
  5. 78 S.E.2d 598 (1953)
 

SMITH v. GRUBB

No. 390.

78 S.E.2d 598 (1953)

238 N.C. 665

SMITH v. GRUBB et al. PROPST CONST. CO., Inc. v. GRUBB et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 25, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Hugh Williams, Concord, Ruark, Ruark & Moore, Raleigh, for plaintiffs appellants.

Hartsell & Hartsell, William L. Mills, Jr., Concord, for defendants appellees.

DEVIN, Chief Justice.

From an examination of the allegations of the two complaints, which in this respect are identical, wherein the plaintiffs have stated the facts constituting their causes of action against the defendants Grubb and Creameries, Inc., we think it affirmatively appears that the negligence of these defendants, if any, was insulated by the active negligence of Delma Smith, and that the demurrers ore tenus should have been sustained, and further that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases