MARGOLIES v. CRAWFORD CLOTHES


24 N.J. Super. 598 (1953)

95 A.2d 413

SAMUEL MARGOLIES, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CRAWFORD CLOTHES, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 27, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Isadore Rabinowitz argued the cause for petitioner-appellant (Mr. Edward H. Saltzman, attorney).

Mr. Thomas J. Brett argued the cause for respondent-respondent (Messrs. O'Brien, Brett & O'Brien, attorneys).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

Appellant suffered a heart attack and sought workmen's compensation therefor. There was no dispute in the County Court that the attack arose out of and during the course of his employment with respondent. The crucial issue presented was whether it was produced by "accident" within the contemplation of the Workmen's Compensation Act. In the Department of Labor the deputy director found...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases