SUN DIAL CORP. v. RIDEOUT


25 N.J. Super. 591 (1953)

96 A.2d 788

SUN DIAL CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. CARL D. RIDEOUT, JAMES L. RIDEOUT, ROBERT A. WHITFIELD, NANCY ORI WHITFIELD AND PRECISION MARKING CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided April 17, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. F.O. Miniutti, and Mr. Ira Milton Jones of the Wisconsin Bar, for the plaintiff (Messrs. Davidson & Miniutti, attorneys).

Mr. Walter D. Van Riper for the defendants (Messrs. Van Riper and Belmont, attorneys).


FREUND, J.S.C.

The plaintiff, Sun Dial Corporation, seeks to restrain the defendants from using an alleged secret process obtained by the defendants while in plaintiff's employ. The defendants deny that the plaintiff's process is secret.

Since the proceeding involved an alleged secret process, the testimony was taken in camera and any discussion of the evidence will be general. Taylor Iron and Steel Co. v. Nichols, 73 N.J. Eq. 684 (

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases