PITKETHLY v. CITY OF PATERSON


12 N.J. 564 (1953)

97 A.2d 596

RUTH M. PITKETHLY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF PATERSON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 22, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Isadore Rabinowitz argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Nathan Rabinowitz, attorney).

Mr. Arthur F. Meade argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Cox & Walburg, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

This is a workmen's compensation case. The subject claim had been dismissed by the Division of Workmen's Compensation, Department of Labor and Industry, State of New Jersey, and the Passaic County Court had subsequently entered judgment for the respondent City of Paterson (hereinafter called the city). The petitioner-appellant, Ruth M. Pitkethly (hereinafter called the plaintiff) appealed to the Superior Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases