CARROLL v. NEWARK PRINTING CO.


25 N.J. Super. 528 (1953)

96 A.2d 728

MACK CARROLL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. NEWARK PRINTING COMPANY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court Law Division.

Decided April 17, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John A. Laird argued the cause for petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Roskein & Laird, attorneys).

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for respondent-respondent (Messrs. Kalisch & Kalisch, attorneys).


FRANCIS, J.C.C.

The claimant here was denied an award of workmen's compensation for failure to establish that he had suffered an accidental injury arising out of and during the course of his employment. Hence this appeal.

Prior to the alleged incident of November or December 1950 Carroll had been in respondent's employ about 12 years as a compositor. This work entailed the cutting and trimming of copper and zinc plates with a power saw. And he testified without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases