DARLING & COMPANY v. DE ADDIO

No. 11738.

204 F.2d 272 (1953)

DARLING & COMPANY, Appellant, v. John DE ADDIO, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 16, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Duncan & Thomas, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Motz, Morris, Wilson & Quine, Akron, Ohio, and McConnell, Blackmore, Cory & Burke, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised.

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed in accordance with the reasons set forth by the District Court in its opinion filed, 112 F.Supp. 166, denying a motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases