BECK v. HAMANN


263 Wis. 131 (1953)

BECK, Appellant, vs. HAMANN and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 3, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Walter W. Rockteschel, Brooke Tibbs, and Howard H. Boyle, Jr., all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Boyle.

For the respondents there was a brief by Quarles, Spence & Quarles, attorneys, and Kenneth P. Grubb, Richard S. Gibbs, and Edmund W. Powell of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Grubb.


MARTIN, J.

Sec. 102.03 (1), Stats., provides that liability under the Workmen's Compensation Act shall exist against an employer only where the following conditions concur:

"(a) Where the employee sustains an injury.

"(b) Where, at the time of the injury, both the employer and employee are subject to the provisions of this chapter.

"(c) Where, at the time of the injury, the employee is performing service growing out of and incidental to his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases