McCARTY v. WEBER


265 Wis. 70 (1953)

McCARTY, Special Administratrix, Appellant, vs. WEBER and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 3, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Weisman & Weisman of Racine, and oral argument by Jacob M. Weisman.

For the respondents there was a brief by Langer & Cross of Baraboo, and oral argument by Clyde C. Cross.


BROWN, J.

There is evidence to sustain all the findings. The most controversial of these concerns Dr. Finnegan's lookout. If there is no evidence to sustain that finding then the case must be sent back for new trial because the finding affects the proportions of negligence. The appellant submits that no one can say what Dr. Finnegan saw or did not see, and contends that since he is dead he is presumed to have exercised due care and the mere fact that he collided with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases