MATTER OF SILVERMAN (HOE & CO.)


305 N.Y. 13 (1953)

In the Matter of Samuel Silverman et al., Appellants. R. Hoe & Co., Inc., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided January 15, 1953


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard S. Kanton, George C. Baron and Frederick Doppelt for appellant.

Neil P. Cullom and Stanford Schewel for respondent.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, DESMOND and FULD, JJ., concur with DYE, J.; FROESSEL, J., dissents in opinion in which CONWAY, J., concurs.


DYE, J.

Being dissatisfied with the terms and conditions of a plan of merger with a subsidiary and recapitalization offered by the respondent, R. Hoe & Co., Inc., hereinafter called the Corporation, the petitioners and other stockholders owning 66,547 shares of the authorized 160,000 shares of the corporation and representing approximately 42% of the total common shares outstanding, dissented therefrom. When...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases